By: G. J. Fortier

Stand firm then … And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord's people. Ephesians 6: 14, 18 (NIV)

Just to serve as a reminder, the point of this series is bringing to light some of the methods that Satan and his minions are using against us in our daily lives to take our focus off God.

Climate change.

You may think that I am a “climate change denier”, but you'd be wrong if you do. Climate changes. It has since God created the Earth and it will continue to change as long as He allows it to exist.

But man-made climate change is the issue. Because of man's abuse of nature, the planet is warming at a rate that's unprecedented in all of history.

Wrong.

If you speak with real scientists like; Piers Corbyn, Roy Spencer, Tim Ball, Tom Harris, Stanley Goldenberg, John Casey, Richard A. Keen, Jay Lehr, Don J. Easterbrook, and William Happer, just to name a few, they will tell you that human influence on climate is negligible at best. Just look up Dr. Martin Mlynczak (no, that is not a typo) a NASA atmospheric climatologist and see what he has to say on the matter.

https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/30000-scientists-sign-petition-on-global-warming?fbclid=IwAR3QnnDwi7yYK8gkgdA6x98fDS_7kBEsUWDZ4s7dK-LCpHQMsuDccAH3H_w#.XJugWEVLQRE.facebook

Geological records prove that the level of CO2 in the atmosphere has varied throughout history, having been as high as eleven times the concentration that it is today, that being 400 ppm (parts per million). When the level of CO2 drops below 280 ppm, plant life begins to die. It is standard practice for CO2 to be pumped into greenhouses to produce heartier plants.

Click here for video.


Seas are not rising as we have been told.

http://green.trendolizer.com/2019/02/un-ipcc-scientist-blows-whistle-on-lies-about-climate-sea-level.html?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork&fbclid=IwAR3k8gH8bTODALOSU9348J4BMcQm0tEleCaO_ALAb-HS0WmdR69xSbBFslc

Ice at the poles is no longer melting.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/25/inconvenient-nasa-says-a-greenland-glacier-did-an-about-face-growing-again/

Wait! I just said “no longer” melting. So, they were melting, right?

Yes, they were … but the melting stopped.

In fact, NASA recently admitted that the ice pack in Greenland has been steadily increasing. The next time that you see a glacier calving — the breaking off of ice chunks — remember that it isn't because it's melting, it's because the weight of the new ice up north is pushing the old ice toward the sea.

The polar bear population has increased 100% since 1980 causing these majestic animals to venture further and further south in search of territory in which to hunt. In fact, some have even begun to mate with grizzly bears in northern Canada and Siberia producing — this is not a joke — growler bears.

Okay, so … here's the question: if the planet isn't warming, why have they been telling us it is for forty years?

Because it has.

Confused? So was I. Like you, at one time, I too bought in to the deception. It wasn't until they changed the narrative from “global warming” to “climate change” and started blaming carbon dioxide instead of carbon monoxide that I first became suspicious. I started to do some research and, to be honest, it wasn't even hard to find massive amounts of evidence that proves that the world is not at risk … and it never was.

Have you ever noticed that they, the global warmists, only ever talk about “climate change” in terms of the past forty to fifty years? But they also blame the Industrial Revolution and the ever-increasing output of CO2 for their fears. The fact is, the Industrial Revolution began in 1790, and some of the harshest winters on record occurred in the first decades of the 1800's. Native Seminoles in Florida tell stories of the “great white rain” that fell during this time. This seems a bit contradictory to me.

Well, there's a reason for that. Without getting technical, the biggest driver of climate in the solar system is — drumroll please — the sun. And the sun isn't the rock steady source of heat and light that most of us think it is. It goes through cycles of 11 years, 22 years, 60 years. 206 years, and on and on. During these fluctuations it varies in brightness, temperature and electromagnetic influence that — you guessed it — changes our climate much more than man could ever hope to. Add to that volcanos, cosmic rays and the albedo effect from increasing cloud cover, and you have a recipe for warming or cooling, depending on the intensity of these and other factors.

Something else happened around the same time as the beginning of the industrial revolution. It was called The Dalton Minimum. It was named for the scientist, John Dalton, who discovered it. Simply put, this was a period of unusually low solar activity, and the Earth was slightly colder than it is today. It stayed that way until somewhere around the 1830's to 1840's when the temperature started rising again. It rose for around 160 to 175 years until it peaked again in 2015.

https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/eddyminimum/

So, if the temperature has been rising for almost two centuries, why do they only talk about the past forty to fifty years? Because it wasn't a steady rise. Recently (relatively speaking), there was a forty year pause in warming, from 1940 to 1980. The 1970's alone saw some of the worst winters in decades, and this kind of stuff just doesn't fit their narrative.

So, if the planet isn't warming anymore, and we are in fact entering a cooling phase, why would scientists all over the world tell us that it's still warming? One word … money. If you want to get a government grant, you have to go along with the narrative.

People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 2 Timothy 3:2 (NIV)

But why would governments only give money to scientists who study climate change/global warming and not to others who are in clear disagreement with this science? After all, science is “the pursuit of truth” isn't it? If even one scientist (and there are many) thinks that they can provide evidence contrary to the “consensus”, wouldn't it be a good idea to at least listen to him/her?

Not if it doesn't support the narrative.

So, what “narrative” is more important than truth?

Control.

And who controls the governments?

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Ephesians 6:12 (NIV)

Enter: Agenda 21/Agenda 2030

See you next week.

Today is the day. Now is the time. The battle is on!

If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from Heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14 (NIV)

G. J. Fortier is a member of Ironmen Ministries and First Baptist Church, Centerville, GA. Look for his novels on Amazon on Kindle and paperback. Or visit his website at www.GerardFortier.com